Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dmitry Mityugov <d(dot)mityugov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: --with-llvm on 32-bit platforms?
Date: 2025-09-16 00:51:21
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+KuAZFcY=8xzwGQnejXMb1yz4B=YQ3qBTUKehRHjLoJA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 12:05 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm. We use TypeSizeT in generated IR for Datum, which is obviously
> > incorrect in this configuration.
>
> Oh! Yeah, that is surely broken now. But it'd only explain problems
> once you reach JIT-ed code, which I'd not expect to happen "early on
> startup". So maybe there's another problem?

Should be easy enough to fix, I just have to remember how to set up a
32 bit environment... on it...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-16 01:26:12 Re: Orphan page in _bt_split
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-16 00:40:50 Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()