| From: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Boussekey <thomas(dot)boussekey(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: getting tables list of other schema too |
| Date: | 2021-02-25 19:00:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+bJJbzZrj3o-JOMBLZq4R4O7oMWT30z7Qf=Ky7VLwwr3PoNxA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Atul.
Due to your top posting style and not being a native english speaker
I'm unable to understand your question.
As all the quotes at the bottom seemed to belong to me, I'm assuming
you referred to some of my postings.
As the last one said I tried to point a thing after checking some
docs, then I noticed some error in my part and tried to tell everybody
to ignore my previous post.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:16 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I am sorry but I am not clear from your response, as I have created
> another instance with same version 9.6 but there no system schema or
> its tables are visible.
Regarding these, I do not know what a "system schema" is May be
"public". Note my post talked about "user cretaed" vs "system" ( I?ve
normally observed those are things like information schema vies,
pg_class an similar tables, which are always there after DB creation
and are normally needed for the server to work ) OBJECTS. Also,
naming an schema "sys" does not make it a system schema.
Francisco Olarte
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rumpi Gravenstein | 2021-02-25 19:52:20 | Re: Postgres Analog of Oracle APPEND hint |
| Previous Message | Stacey Haysler | 2021-02-25 18:53:44 | Code of Conduct: Hebrew Translation for Review |