Re: splitting *_desc routines

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: splitting *_desc routines
Date: 2012-11-23 22:37:31
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLwiuPAtQNk15+6h7uvGXXErkWCjazAur-k0MBFCknDqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 November 2012 22:52, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> ./access/rmgrdesc/xact_desc.c
> ./access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c

Could we have either all underscores _ or none at all for the naming?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-11-23 23:45:32 Re: splitting *_desc routines
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2012-11-23 22:34:45 Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables