Quick Links

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv

From:	Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To:	Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv
Date:	2011-11-02 19:48:43
Message-ID:	CA+U5nMLim2jmrCpvJH0nm3phQWJ_vrXCmocXR7QoNiRVq_Unww@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Again, it's no longer the maximum time between automatic checkpoints.

You're missing the point that it never was like that. I've not altered
the situation.

And it doesn't matter either, so I will ignore.

If you see a need to correct those docs, feel free.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Tom Lane	2011-11-02 21:54:37	pgsql: Fix btree stop-at-nulls logic properly.
Previous Message	Robert Haas	2011-11-02 18:27:25	Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce checkpoints and WAL traffic on low activity database serv

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Simon Riggs	2011-11-02 20:07:38	Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2011-11-02 19:48:22	Re: GiST for range types (was Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor)