Re: Checksums, state of play

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checksums, state of play
Date: 2012-03-06 17:22:55
Message-ID: CA+U5nM+r9mVDZ3_=RsHqV-is4V72f0r4_agGrXkAjkhvyQXVoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

>> Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version
>> field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that?
>
>
> The EDB page format is exactly the same as the community one. Thanks for
> asking.

No problem, anytime. Just wanted to make sure downstream wasn't affected.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-03-06 17:23:52 Re: Checksums, state of play
Previous Message Artur Litwinowicz 2012-03-06 17:20:48 Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database