From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Checksums, state of play |
Date: | 2012-03-06 17:14:02 |
Message-ID: | 4F5645DA.90203@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06.03.2012 19:00, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> As to whether we should increment pd_pagesize_version, I'm not sure
>> quite what you were saying about that (I think you may have an extra
>> or missing word there), but I don't think it's necessary here.
>
> I said this...
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs<simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Do you know of any PostgreSQL variant that can set this byte range to
>> different values?
>
> Not sure what the missing word is there, so I'll ask again.
>
> Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version
> field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that?
The EDB page format is exactly the same as the community one. Thanks for
asking.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-06 17:14:45 | Re: Checksums, state of play |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-06 17:13:57 | Re: Checksums, state of play |