Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe(dot)os(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2022-02-11 15:50:09
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobo_ZQpRw3rDKM0H6iOBEv4ccA=-7bGo4OSXeHGiWQm4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:29 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> FYI: there's a couple typos in the last 2 patches.

Hmm. OK. But I don't consider "can be optionally specified" incorrect
or worse than "can optionally be specified".

I do agree that spelling words correctly is a good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-02-11 15:50:44 Re: pg_receivewal.exe unhandled exception in zlib1.dll
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-02-11 15:41:27 Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc