| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pglogical questions and problems |
| Date: | 2016-04-13 16:48:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobnJfmcH0as9MFzWB6xPmUCH2xCZ2gd2xUeAQjyS97xGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Anyway, who agrees with the overall design of pglogical and who does not?
I haven't spent very much time on it yet. I tend to prefer the idea
of integrating it more deeply into core and adding SQL syntax around
it, but I'm not going to fight tooth and nail for that if a contrary
consensus emerges.
I think this would be a good topic to discuss at PGCon.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-13 17:03:26 | Re: Incomplete startup packet errors |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-04-13 16:25:47 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |