From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences |
Date: | 2012-01-19 23:53:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobkqgdj4np_bX16ozNq=ZMF2HXUqLt_987J7K_tFYbLAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 18:07:33 -0300 2012:
>
>> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document
>> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than
>> it appears to be at first glance.
>
> Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion.
I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we
really do want this behavior...?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-01-20 00:15:15 | Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2012-01-19 23:33:55 | Re: WIP: index support for regexp search |