Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences
Date: 2012-01-20 00:15:15
Message-ID: 1327018412-sup-5856@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 20:53:42 -0300 2012:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue ene 19 18:07:33 -0300 2012:
> >
> >> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document
> >> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than
> >> it appears to be at first glance.
> >
> > Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion.
>
> I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we
> really do want this behavior...?

Well, it documents what happened when we tried to do it. Sort of like
"features we do not want". But then, maybe it's just TODO bloat.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-01-20 00:27:01 Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-19 23:53:42 Re: WIP -- renaming implicit sequences