Re: 9.4 broken on alpha

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> On 2015-09-01 14:40:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> The best argument for continuing to support Alpha is probably that
>>>> Linux does.
>
>>> Not sure why that's an argument? I mean linux supports architectures
>>> without an MMU, but we'll surely never?
>
>> I'm just saying that, we're arguing that we can't do it, but they're
>> doing it, so presumably we could find a way if we were really
>> determined. I'm not saying that it's a good use of time, but Linux
>> seems to think it is.
>
> I think we've probably beat this to death. Nobody here believes that
> it's sane to try to support Alpha without access to hardware, and no
> offer of hardware has been forthcoming. If one were to materialize,
> we could usefully have a debate about whether it's worth doing ...

Yep.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company