Re: A couple of postgresql.conf.sample discrepancies

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A couple of postgresql.conf.sample discrepancies
Date: 2017-07-27 20:31:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmobhdrHOLQ2prTQEL=E1BmYrcgB-PU41KQ_k8HAUoQeQEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Aleksander Alekseev
<a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I like the idea. However maybe it worth considering to turn it into a
> TAP test? Otherwise there is a good chance everybody will forget to run
> it. For similar reason I would advise to add this patch to the next
> commitfest.

Instead of adding it to a TAP test, I think we should add it to the
build process, so you get a compile failure if it finds any problems.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-07-27 20:33:32 Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-07-27 20:14:45 Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows