Re: The case for removing replacement selection sort

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The case for removing replacement selection sort
Date: 2017-09-07 21:49:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmobdEW0FKon7y53317WQ8ujaetJ1kOao+a-=q=GqHyba+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Do we need/want to repeat some of that benchmarking on these patches? I
> don't recall how much this code changed since those benchmarks were done
> in the 9.6 cycle.

+1 for some new benchmarking. I'm all for removing this code if we
don't need it any more, but it'd be a lot better to have more numbers
before deciding that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-09-07 21:49:59 Re: GnuTLS support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-09-07 21:48:18 Re: Parallel worker error