| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-10-26 18:06:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobadbgMmA6SLi6mwAWsSqm7VtPhRsNobXTSrsrQ97ZcFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> a. Policy on table_name
No, because queries against the parent will apply the policy to
children. See today's commit
162477a63d3c0fd1c31197717140a88077a8d0aa.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-26 18:09:59 | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-26 18:04:55 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |