| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Shouldn't CREATE TABLE LIKE copy the relhasoids property? |
| Date: | 2015-04-20 16:17:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobJt_20JzHEeuV42v02efm5d8DaP-RPahhFdjhgANG0cQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:32:23PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> > Should this be listed in the release notes as a backward-incompatibility?
>>
>> Isn't this a backpatchable bug fix?
>
> Uh, I don't think so. I think users are used to the existing behavior
> and changing it on them will cause more harm than good. Also, we have
> had zero field reports about this problem.
I agree. This should not be back-patched, but fixing it in master seems fine.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-04-20 16:22:56 | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-20 16:15:45 | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |