Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date: 2015-10-22 16:53:49
Message-ID: CA+TgmobFYKJBxsFgthH-vjVH7fx6E7UvPM722dremjHcmvcgiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev
<u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hello.
> Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full plan. In
> this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task parallel query
> does not have such a problem?

It's already fixed. See commits
a0d9f6e434bb56f7e5441b7988f3982feead33b3 and
9f1255ac859364a86264a67729dbd1a36dd63ff2.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2015-10-22 17:10:11 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-10-22 16:34:55 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #13694: Row Level Security by-passed with CREATEUSER permission