| From: | YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query |
| Date: | 2015-10-22 17:19:41 |
| Message-ID: | 2114858.AupMSLaA2Q@dinodell |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 22 October 2015 12:53:49 you wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev
>
> <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full
> > plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task
> > parallel query does not have such a problem?
>
> It's already fixed. See commits
> a0d9f6e434bb56f7e5441b7988f3982feead33b3 and
> 9f1255ac859364a86264a67729dbd1a36dd63ff2.
Ahh. Thanks.
And then another question:
What do you think if the generated equalfuncs.c, copyfuncs.c, readfuncs.c,
outfuncs.c from XML or JSON?
In order not to change the code in four places when changing nodes.
--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-22 17:24:32 | make Gather node projection-capable |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2015-10-22 17:10:11 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |