From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CustomScan and readfuncs.c |
Date: | 2015-07-29 20:29:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob7C-w2b9thditZ-g9=WMRKww81GSir5nDX1ya2AqFpgA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Um ... wait a second. There is no support in readfuncs for any
> plan node type, and never has been, and I seriously doubt that there
> ever should be.
As KaiGai says, the parallel query stuff contemplates changing this;
how else will we get the plan from the master to each worker? We
could invent a bespoke serialization format, but that seems to have
exactly nothing to recommend it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-07-29 20:42:55 | Re: upgrade failure from 9.5 to head |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-29 20:26:55 | Re: more RLS oversights |