| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <joe(dot)conway(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: more RLS oversights |
| Date: | 2015-07-29 20:26:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaphzxdUsq9Z3H0AQy0PT8_=mmANV5t0vmW9Gwuo2-DNQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I think this reads a bit funny. What's a "POLICY USING" clause? I
> expect that translators will treat the two words POLICY USING as a
> single token, and the result is not going to make any sense.
>
> Maybe "in a policy's USING and WITH CHECK expressions", or perhaps "in
> policies's USING and WITH CHECK exprs", not sure.
Yeah, I don't see why we would capitalize POLICY there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-29 20:29:10 | Re: CustomScan and readfuncs.c |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-07-29 20:22:49 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |