Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date: 2016-03-08 22:16:34
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob1d8pxnzTOTDDVotcwS_xfO796u4oeQLN3PAQToaebrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Instead of "durable" I think that "persistent" makes more sense.
>
> I find durable a lot more descriptive. persistent could refer to
> retrying the rename or something.

Yeah, I like durable, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-03-08 22:17:05 Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-08 22:14:40 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions