Re: fixing CREATEROLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fixing CREATEROLE
Date: 2022-12-23 21:55:38
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob-JucEQGEYzm_oARcJ-Y40AGBa2-FTDJbLC94_q17JtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:14 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> The contents looks good to me other than that problem, and I agree to
> backpatch it.

Cool. Thanks for the review.

> Why did you choose to use two dots for ellipses in some command
> <literal>s rather than three? I know I've made that choice too on
> occassion, but there aren't many such cases and maybe we should put a
> stop to it (or a period) before it spreads too much.

Honestly, I wasn't aware that we had some other convention for it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dag Lem 2022-12-23 22:48:02 Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Previous Message Dag Lem 2022-12-23 21:44:26 Re: daitch_mokotoff module