| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 01:56:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoayhKhjFDAbnxFJV67Pitz-tS+LHCkd67DKZ4ckZvLfvQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think this is better option, Since we will search last two pages of FSM
> tree, then no need to update the upper level of the FSM tree. Right ?
Well, it's less important in that case, but I think it's still worth
doing. Some people are going to do just plain GetPageWithFreeSpace().
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-29 01:59:58 | Re: Relation extension scalability |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-29 01:53:33 | Re: Reworks of CustomScan serialization/deserialization |