Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)
Date: 2019-01-11 15:33:48
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoay_-rwyPGTTw4BAc=_MsvZdMc+BJMfut99Ld0BB74UBw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:42 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Use shorter method names? This sounds like an ugly workaround for
> a carpal-tunnel-syndrome-inducing design.

What would you suggest instead of something like
"relation_set_new_filenode"? I agree that shorter names have some
merit, but it's not always easy to figure out how to shorten them
without making the result unclear.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-11 16:12:25 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-01-11 15:32:03 Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)