Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Date: 2017-04-04 13:45:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoathxbFZyi1EphhRyLFKjHbTVDj-qT77FdkX9Vy1p_2Nw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> 0002 looks extremely straightforward, but I wonder if we could get one
>> of the people on this list who knows about sepgsql to have a look?
>> (Stephen Frost, Joe Conway, KaiGai Kohei...)
>
> Will have a look later today.

I think it is now tomorrow, unless your time zone is someplace very
far away. :-)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-04 13:52:17 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-04 13:43:15 Re: Re: PATCH: pageinspect / add page_checksum and bt_page_items(bytea)