From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: the need to finish |
Date: | 2017-04-12 16:51:49 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoath=yAhiL-7HMcdKe5jJ07yYPfts+Sym==mVZLDbwcaA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 16:26, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> writes:
>>> Logical replication emits logmessages like these:
>>> DETAIL: 90 transactions need to finish.
>>> I would prefer the line to be more terse:
>>> DETAIL: 90 transactions to finish.
>> Our style guidelines say that detail messages should be complete
>> sentences, so I don't like your proposal too much.
>> Maybe "N transactions remain to finish." ?
> waiting for N transactions to complete
+1 for something along those lines, but perhaps it needs a capital
letter and a period.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-12 17:00:37 | Re: [sqlsmith] ERROR: badly formatted node string "RESTRICTINFO... |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-04-12 16:42:04 | Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation |