Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type
Date: 2016-12-13 15:46:02
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoamt_zD=5vyagPWKu48-Q4pz-E77Mc3N+-6A29i-KtuHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I find this a bit unclear, because the revised text kind of jumps back
>> and forth between the floating-point and integer formats. Perhaps
>> something like this:
>
> Your wording seems OK to me, although I'd drop the "instead".

Good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Jackson 2016-12-13 15:50:33 Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation [and 2 more messages]
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-13 15:44:13 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take