Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type
Date: 2016-12-13 15:41:24
Message-ID: 32154.1481643684@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I find this a bit unclear, because the revised text kind of jumps back
> and forth between the floating-point and integer formats. Perhaps
> something like this:

Your wording seems OK to me, although I'd drop the "instead".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-13 15:44:13 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-13 15:39:57 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take