Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2022-11-18 18:43:16
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoajx8hr3269bfvvnKU88yO5g-vdhxjM7AJMo+mZjh-kwg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:50 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a rebased v3 to see what cfbot thinks.

cfbot is happy, so committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-11-18 18:48:14 Sending SIGABRT to child processes (was Re: Strange failure on mamba)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-11-18 18:43:14 Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE