Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2022-11-18 18:50:04
Message-ID: 6dbd7e92-31af-d537-c080-e920225baaa7@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Op 18-11-2022 om 19:43 schreef Robert Haas:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:50 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here's a rebased v3 to see what cfbot thinks.
>
> cfbot is happy, so committed.

In grant.sgml,

'actualy permisions'

looks a bit unorthodox.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2022-11-18 18:54:47 Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-18 18:48:14 Sending SIGABRT to child processes (was Re: Strange failure on mamba)