Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run
Date: 2015-07-14 13:01:54
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoah5fG0BnM_YzL91YGfF8Ed=Bk=EMyhpKMta2=jyqtxSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> Pushed, thanks.
>
> Shouldn't we consider back-patching these improvements into 9.5 and 9.4?
> ISTM the main point is to help debug buildfarm failures, and we won't be
> getting much benefit if only one-third of such reports have decent
> logging.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-07-14 13:02:58 Re: pgsql: Retain comments on indexes and constraints at ALTER TABLE ... TY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-07-14 12:59:42 Re: RLS fails to work with UPDATE ... WHERE CURRENT OF