Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run
Date: 2015-07-09 13:43:59
Message-ID: 32043.1436449439@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> Pushed, thanks.

Shouldn't we consider back-patching these improvements into 9.5 and 9.4?
ISTM the main point is to help debug buildfarm failures, and we won't be
getting much benefit if only one-third of such reports have decent
logging.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2015-07-09 13:53:18 Re: obsolete comment in elog.h
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-07-09 13:40:19 Re: Cube extension kNN support