Re: background sessions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <amborodin(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: background sessions
Date: 2016-12-12 13:54:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoagottDtLDXUGLNqSJ1o1teC1dbML+TETZe9FFU1BiNTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Andrew Borodin <borodin(at)octonica(dot)com> wrote:
> 1. As far as I can see, we connot use COPY FROM STDIN in bg session?
> Since one of purposes is to orchestrate transactions, may be that
> would be valuable.

A background worker has no client connection, so what would COPY FROM STDIN do?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-12-12 14:01:53 Re: jacana hung after failing to acquire random number
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2016-12-12 13:50:46 [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type