| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
| Date: | 2014-11-12 15:13:18 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaXp+50rk_7=_8HjMauhBTFWZ3uUpYXD=JS+tC-J+djFw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The more important thing here is that I see little chance of this
> getting in before Heikki's larger rework of the wal format gets
> in. Since that'll change everything around anyay I'm unsure how much
> point there is to iterate till that's done. I know that sucks, but I
> don't see much of an alternative.
Why not do this first? Heikki's patch seems quite far from being
ready to commit at this point - it significantly increases WAL volume
and reduces performance. Heikki may well be able to fix that, but I
don't know that it's a good idea to make everyone else wait while he
does.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-11-12 15:14:00 | Re: Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-11-12 15:08:58 | Re: Race condition between hot standby and restoring a FPW |