| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2017-12-01 17:13:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaT8M4v-68MM0UzWZQL9sBghPsbrccwxNoStjz4L4XRjQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, committed. This is a good example of how having good code
>> coverage doesn't necessarily mean you've found all the bugs. :-)
>>
> As of now partition_join.sql is not having test cases covering cases
> where partition table have default partition, attaching a small test
> case patch to cover those.
That's not that small, and to me it looks like overkill.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-12-01 17:15:47 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-12-01 17:10:12 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks |