Re: LDAP: bugfix and deprecated OpenLDAP API

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LDAP: bugfix and deprecated OpenLDAP API
Date: 2013-02-07 12:38:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaPsUmpUMsJMjc_-RZjiTBdrk7MZgNxK9b=mj9HRn_Rzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> I guess it's too late for something like that to go into 9.3.
> Should I add it to the next commitfest?

Bug fixes can go in pretty much whenever, but adding it to the next
CommitFest is a good way of backstopping it against the possibility
that it might be forgotten.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2013-02-07 12:45:17 A question about the psql \copy command
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-02-07 11:49:32 Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters