Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters
Date: 2013-02-07 11:49:32
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZrUV+RXRewcOsScU51CVS2Hj9YDZT_38Tj9q6OugKtbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> IMO the way to resolve that conflict is with a behaviour parameter to
> allow people to choose, rather than be forced to wait a year because
> some people still run an old version of an add-on package. A good way
> to do that would be to have a sql_standard = postgres | 2011 etc so we
> can tick the box in having a sql standard flagger as well.

The undesirability of syntax-altering GUCs has been discussed here on
many occasions.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-02-07 12:38:31 Re: LDAP: bugfix and deprecated OpenLDAP API
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-02-07 11:48:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.