Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: perform UPDATE/DELETE .. RETURNING on a join directly
Date: 2018-03-02 18:20:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaNWpQ+F7_DtiJpc62PUJ6JQBAQpT1H7CBrjKmryGGgkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Agreed. Better safe than sorry, so I disabled autovacuum for all the tables
> created in the postgres_fdw regression test, except the ones with no data
> modification created in the sections "test handling of collations" and "test
> IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA". I'm attaching a patch for that.

I have committed this patch. Whee!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-02 18:20:28 Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-03-02 18:04:21 Re: [PATCH] Verify Checksums during Basebackups