Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date: 2023-02-17 05:14:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaL9mbfBWjVihkrP+upJKsqQtd8QF8sV5WJ_QwLRBq1RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 9:45 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2023-02-16 15:05:10 +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> > The fact that we can't use ICU on Windows, though, weakens this
> > argument a lot. In my experience, we have a lot of Windows users, and
> > they're not any happier with the operating system collations than
> > Linux users. Possibly less so.
>
> Why can't you use ICU on windows? It works today, afaict?

Uh, I had the contrary impression from the discussion upthread, but it
sounds like I might be misunderstanding the situation?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zheng Li 2023-02-17 05:28:06 Re: Support logical replication of global object commands
Previous Message David Rowley 2023-02-17 05:03:37 Re: Reducing System Allocator Thrashing of ExecutorState to Alleviate FDW-related Performance Degradations