From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: autoprewarm_dump_now |
Date: | 2025-05-29 13:58:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaJx5mbuXbk0RXiQ=p+xA4kaw+UP7tyUvyQTmgjw6rB7A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 9:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Is that solving a real-world problem? If it is, shouldn't we be
> looking for a different approach that doesn't require such a huge
> amount of memory?
Upthread, Heikki said that this function currently fails with
shared_buffers>409GB. While I'm not opposed to a more efficient
solution, it seems reasonable to me to suppose that if you've got
shared_buffers>409GB, you're able to afford having this function use
>1GB.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-05-29 14:28:35 | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-05-29 13:43:41 | Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them |