Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Akshat Jaimini <destrex271(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker
Date: 2024-01-31 20:18:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaJeea1W7Jm6_Qod7feTfGnM6PrU_syPnLpzLgBZHHKMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 9:56 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't follow the "Idle since July" since it just hasn't received
> review since then, so there's been nothing to reply to.

It wasn't clear to me if you thought that the patch was ready for
review since July, or if it was waiting on you since July. Those are
quite different, IMV.

> That being said, Vignesh's note in January about a now-failing test is
> relevant activity, and I've just today responded to that, so I'm
> changing the status back from Waiting on Author to Needs Review.

Sounds good.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-01-31 20:49:36 Re: Incorrect cost for MergeAppend
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-01-31 19:57:35 Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm