From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead |
Date: | 2022-07-03 14:41:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaH=LUU=fXbRRPT4OOJRgiDe_xiv=jyZ7hqTaqtWaG3Gw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 1:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> On the whole, I'm questioning the value of messing with our autoconf
> infrastructure at this stage. We did agree at PGCon that we'd keep
> it going for a couple years more, but it's not real clear to me why
> we can't limp along with 2.69 until we decide to drop it.
If building it on macOS is going to be annoying, then -1 from me for
upgrading to a new version until that's resolved.
Hmm, I also don't know how annoying it's going to be to get the new
ninja/meson stuff working on macOS ... I really hope someone puts a
good set of directions on the wiki or in the documentation or
someplace.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-03 14:50:49 | Re: PSA: Autoconf has risen from the dead |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-07-03 14:40:21 | Re: Fix proposal for comparaison bugs in PostgreSQL::Version |