Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2019-01-28 19:47:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaGx3vvNfMx-SKcOyZi6pEzc374KrrByBWksUsuGkDFLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:21 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Anyway I think the names need to be any-something.

To me, that seems unnecessarily rigid. Not a bad idea if we can come
up with something that is otherwise acceptable. But all of your
suggestions sound worse than Pavel's proposal, so...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-01-28 20:17:19 Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-01-28 19:47:15 Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?