Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rename nodes/relation.h => nodes/pathnodes.h ?
Date: 2019-01-28 19:47:15
Message-ID: 201901281947.bv5koosxaelf@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Jan-28, Tom Lane wrote:

> (There was some mention of trying to split relation.h into multiple
> files, but I fail to see any advantage in that.)

Hmm, nodes/relation.h includes lots of other files and is widely
included. If we can split it usefully, I vote for that. However, I
failed to find any concrete proposal for doing that. I don't have one
ATM but I'd like to keep the door open for it happening at some point.

I do like planner/pathnodes.h as a name, FWIW.

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-01-28 19:47:33 Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Previous Message John Naylor 2019-01-28 19:06:49 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables