| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach |
| Date: | 2018-02-01 15:39:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8kn2M=PHw8q6t67bFOUcHvmDr-WhzDcuBu0TuSXddMg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker"
> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision.
I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could
be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable. Just might wait a
little longer than absolutely necessary.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2018-02-01 15:47:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Creating backup history files for backups taken from standbys |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-02-01 15:31:40 | Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound |