| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block |
| Date: | 2022-11-17 20:06:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa8gKKi_xbOmgVAgANhvMGRMTT2wJKrXsB+yZEFtv=DaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 5:14 PM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> However I'm not a fan of commands that sometimes do one thing and
> sometimes magically do something very different. I don't like the idea
> that the same vacuum command would sometimes run in-process and
> sometimes do this out of process request. And the rules for when it
> does which are fairly complex to explain -- it runs in process unless
> you're in a transaction when it runs out of process unless it's a
> temporary table ...
100% agree.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-11-17 20:13:04 | Re: ubsan fails on 32bit builds |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-11-17 20:04:57 | Re: redundant check of msg in does_not_exist_skipping |