Re: LWLockWaitUntilFree (was: Group commit, revised)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLockWaitUntilFree (was: Group commit, revised)
Date: 2012-02-07 14:07:19
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa6SYt=rJ34k1wU+QA2vDkkgFAkabnt_WP=AnyznQb1Ww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 03.02.2012 22:57, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I think I recommended a bad name for this function.  It's really
>> LWLockAcquireOrWaitUntilFree.  Can we rename that?
>
> Agreed, that's better. Although quite long. "LWLockAcquireOrWait" perhaps?

Sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-02-07 14:14:17 Re: Removing special case OID generation
Previous Message David Fetter 2012-02-07 13:56:52 Re: semi-PoC: kNN-gist for cubes