Re: LWLockWaitUntilFree (was: Group commit, revised)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLockWaitUntilFree (was: Group commit, revised)
Date: 2012-02-07 08:48:46
Message-ID: 4F30E56E.1040208@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03.02.2012 22:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think I recommended a bad name for this function. It's really
> LWLockAcquireOrWaitUntilFree. Can we rename that?

Agreed, that's better. Although quite long. "LWLockAcquireOrWait" perhaps?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2012-02-07 09:08:49 Re: double writes using "double-write buffer" approach [WIP]
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-02-07 08:15:08 Re: Group commit, revised