| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
| Date: | 2023-04-05 13:28:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa2f5Q-Hu4SZ7yGL1HTDaBWwmOPEaF-JTpAL0+rLcPrtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 12:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Basically, I want to reject this on the grounds that it's not
> useful enough to justify the overhead of marking the "role" GUC
> as GUC_REPORT.
I agree with that. I think we need some method for optionally
reporting values, so that stuff like this can be handled without
adding it to the wire protocol for everyone. I don't think we can just
keep adding stuff to the set of things that gets reported for
everyone. It doesn't scale. We need a really good reason to enlarge
the set of values reported for all users, and I don't think this meets
that bar.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-04-05 13:44:58 | Re: monitoring usage count distribution |
| Previous Message | Kumar, Sachin | 2023-04-05 13:25:12 | RE: Initial Schema Sync for Logical Replication |