| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |
| Date: | 2019-03-07 15:03:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-u8yqc60zuxRRYxS0AHzuEVR1ydzRK_TGin_evYLpPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:03 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hmm, the patch already has new reloption vacuum_index_cleanup and
> default value is true but you meant I should change its name to
> index_cleanup?
No, I mean that you should make it so that someone writes VACUUM
(INDEX_CLEANUP false) instead of VACUUM (DISABLE_INDEX_CLEANUP).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-07 15:08:38 | Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-07 15:01:37 | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |