Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_proc.dat "proargmodes is not a 1-D char array"
Date: 2020-11-17 19:39:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZsn_uoR=L-T5uwHhriO=qC6GTX02ssmnmkAMY-VwHoyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Adding the expected length to the error message might be OK though.

Certainly seems like we should do at least that much. The current
message is just wrong, right?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2020-11-17 19:50:20 Re: [patch] [doc] Clarify that signal functions have no feedback
Previous Message Alexey Kondratov 2020-11-17 19:37:28 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit